Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Hate Facts on Gun Control, Gun Violence, and Gun Rights – the Logic and the Numbers*


A call for legislation often repeated, especially after a mass shooting, is that there should be new controls placed upon gun ownership.  That the call has been made repeatedly is part of the problem, for that means there has been another mass shooting with more victims.  School shootings get the calls for gun ownership reviews as well, as those shootings involved children.  In both cases, stronger gun laws are advanced.  What factors are involved in the calls for gun ownership review and control: who can own what, as allowed by whom? The corollary is for what reason, or to achieve what?

Looking at the second question first, the reason advanced for escalating gun control is that there have been shootings with people murdered and the goal is to stop murders: stop gun homicides.  However, the reaction that many make in response to mass and school shootings is about stopping ‘gun violence.’  The Prevention Institute’s (2019) ‘What we can do…’ section laments a mass shooting, then uses verbiage of “… the pandemic of gun violence.”  That is an intentional change in terminology.  Gun violence is a broader category than gun homicide.  Gun violence includes any violence where a gun is involved, while homicide (murders) are a specific subset within gun violence.  

Why this prevarication?  It is because the numbers are needed to be inflated.  FBI data show in 2017 there were 15,129 homicides, which include firearms (total 10,982), knives and cutting instruments (1,591), blunt objects (467), and other various ways of killing someone (FBI. 2018).  Everytown (2019) is a group that has on their website a section entitled ‘Everytown Law’ which states “Everytown Law fights for the right of every American to be free from gun violence.”  As homicides are not the limit of gun violence, what is included in gun violence must be reviewed.  Gun violence is the issue that politicians want to address as they want to review gun laws which can include restrictions to bans on parts, features or the full firearm, and mandatory ‘buyback’ plans (Dobuzinskis, 2019; Epstein, 2019; Stevens, 2019).

Gun violence includes, according to Everytown, deaths and injuries, done to oneself (self-harm and suicide), unintentional harm and deaths, shootings by law enforcement, and ‘undetermined’ (2019).    This inflates the number of dead to 36,383 (average deaths a year), while from homicide according to the FBI was 10,982 in 2017.  That more than tripled the number of dead from broadening the category to ‘gun violence’ instead of ‘gun homicide.’

With gun violence as the standard (homicide, accident, suicide, and defensive), what we have is a morally relativistic, overbroad term that has the lone distinction being that a gun was involved, in order to combine various types of deaths or injuries.  That is like treating women the same regardless of whether they masturbated or jumped on their bicycles too hard, or were raped, all because a hymen broke. 

In addition, focusing on that one commonality (guns), as the link to various behaviors, will by design emphasize that commonality.  If one was making a khopesh violence study, then khopeshes would be prominent across the various types of behaviors.  With guns as the standard to link different behaviors, of course guns are going to be heavily represented. 

As an estimate of 07/01/2018, there are 327,167,434 people in the United States of America (U. S. Census Bureau, 2018).  From that, 30% own a gun, with 11% not owning a gun but living with someone who does (Igielnik & Brown, 2017).  Using those figures, that gives us 98,150.230 gun owners.  The Small Arms Survey (2018) has those in the United States owning more than 393,000,000 guns, which is around 45% of world-wide gun-ownership.  By sheer numbers and proximity, guns in general are more available in the United States than elsewhere. 

As a percentage, the Americas (South, Central, and North) have more homicides with guns than other areas of the planet (UNODC, 2013).  However, looking at McEvoy and Hideg (2018) data, we see that there were around 560,000 homicides in 2016 with only around 210,000 (around 38%) of those homicides because of guns.  Guns do not account for even half of all homicides, yet politicians want to focus on guns.  Furthermore, though the US has a higher rate of homicide by guns amongst weapon types, it does not have a high rate of homicides overall.  Using the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) data, the Crime Prevention Research Center (2014) found the US near the middle of overall homicide rates out of 192 countries.   Looking at UNODC and Small Arms Survey data, Chalabi (2012) found that though the US has the highest rate of gun ownership (120 guns for every 100 people), it does not have the highest rate of gun homicides at 2.97 per 100,000, whereas Honduras had the highest at 68.43 per 100,000 (14 guns for every 100 people), and the US’ southern neighbor Mexico had 9.97 per 100,000 with 12.9% gun ownership rate. Even with the inflated, relativistic concept of ‘gun violence’ in 2016, the US had a lower gun-death rate than Mexico (10.6 to 11.8), and far from places like El Salvador and Venezuela (39.2 & 38.7) per 100,000, with ownership rates of 12% and 18.5% (Santhanam, 2018; Small Arms Survey, 2018).

Regardless of which ‘side of the aisle’ a politician may sit, many have called for degrees of expanding government control over who can have what type of weapon, if at all.  This includes members of Congress, presidential nominees, and presidents themselves, including Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Eric Swalwell, Bernie Sanders, Brian Mast, Barak Obama, Donald Trump, and many others (Bowman, 2019; Dobuzinskis, 2019; Epstein, 2019; Gillin, 2016; Greenwood, 2018; Stevens, 2019).  The politicians advance that they, through the government can help protect the people, with the right programs.

In 1996 a shooter committed a mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia that left 35 dead and 18 injured (Tikkanen, 2016).  After the homicides by that shooter, Australia’s government enacted expansive new gun laws and restrictions including the National Firearms Agreement (NFA), which were said to have prevented all mass shootings since the one at Port Arthur (Evershed, 2018; Leaf, 2018).  However, looking at data and trends, the NFA did not have a statistical impact upon homicide or suicide rates as those had been decreasing in Australia since the 1980s (Siegel, 2018).  In addition, stating that Australia had no mass shootings since Port Arthur is incorrect [just erroneous to a manipulative lie] as mass shootings in Australia since sweeping gun laws went into effect include: the Hunt family murders (four killed not including the shooter’s suicide, by shotgun) in 2014 (Begley, 2015); in the city of Darwin a man out on parole killed four men and wounded a woman (by shotgun) in 2019 (McGuirk, 2019); seven killed in the Margaret River mass shooting (multiple guns) in 2018 (McGowan, 2018); the Monash University mass shooting left two dead and five injured (by multiple handguns) in 2002 (Marshall, 2015).  As those cases contradict what politicians and news outlets [vested interests] are trying to sell, they get overlooked.

Gun ownership and gun homicide are not evenly spread out across the US.  58% of rural households have a gun, while only 29% of urban households own a gun (Mitchell, 2018).  However, gun homicide is heavily localized to specific counties, and even within certain areas within those counties as 73% of US counties had no murders between 1977 and 2000 while 51% of murders in the US are committed within 2% of US counties (Crime Prevention Research Center, 2017).  The World Health Organization (2015) report with Robert Muggah reported “…that 99% of violence in the USA is concentrated in 5% of street addresses” (p. 28).  Where there are higher rates of gun ownership in rural areas there are fewer gun homicides, while in urban areas with lower rates of gun ownership there are higher rates of gun homicide.

Whether in the US with cities that have higher gun control laws (e.g. Chicago and Washington DC), or another country (Australia), gun control laws do not stop gun homicide even though all in the area are affected, people within certain areas still inflict violence against others.

Guns are tools.  Tools can be used as weapons to inflict violence.  As the FBI (2018) report showed, knives and blunt instruments still accounted for 2,058 homicides.  Tools can also be used defensively.  Defensive gun use (DGU) is hard to accurately measure as there are multiple factors that contribute to its underreporting, which makes an estimate range from 600,000 to 3,700,000 incidents (Kleck, 2018b).  The Violence Policy Center reviewing David Hemenway and National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data shows DGU to be 235,700 over a five year period for a yearly average of 47,140 DGUs (Violence Policy Center, 2015).  The Violence Policy Center is an advocacy group (Violence Policy Center, 2019), as in their ‘Our Approach’ section in ‘About the VPC’ is a bullet point of “ADVOCACY: We bring an informed and evidence-based perspective to the campaign for stronger gun violence prevention laws and policies. We build relationships with policymakers at the local, state, and federal levels to work for effective solutions that will save lives.”   

Reviewing Kleck’s data, at the low end, DGU is around 60 times and at the high end 370 times higher than gun homicide; reviewing the Violence Policy Center’s data, there is still more than 1.6 times DGU than gun violence, and four times more than gun homicide.  However, DGU is not only stopping homicide attempts, but can include other defensive uses including other types of assaults, or stopping animal attacks (Kleck, 2018b); in addition, it is a well-known issue in science that phrasing and terminology can affect how respondents answer questions, and Kleck (2018a) showed that such issues affected the low responses and DGU estimates by Hemenway and the NCVS.

‘Assault’ weapon attacks get plenty of coverage whenever they are used in a mass shooting.  However, what exactly is an assault weapon differs amongst who is trying to define it, and can change as California passed/modified a law so a previously exempt feature was made no longer exempt and made the weapon a banned ‘assault weapon,’ and Ohio had legislation proposed that would not just affect AR-15s but all semi-automatic weapons (Daniels, 2018).  AR-15s “… seem to be the weapon of choice in some of the deadliest mass shootings…” (Radzievich & Turner, 2019).  With that as an understanding, politicians such as Kirsten Gillibrand, Bernie Sanders, Eric Swalwell, Kamala Harris, John Kasich, among others each call for imposing stronger restrictions to full bans on AR-15s and similar style firearms (Associated Press, 2019; Daniels, 2018; Larsen, 2019; Radzievich & Turner, 2019; Samuels, 2019; Watkins, 2019).  There are an estimated 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 AR-15 and like guns in the US (Yablon, 2018).

Looking at the numbers, let’s focus on the United States.  From 1993 to 2011 the rate of gun homicides per 100,000 more than halved from 6.6 to 3.2 (Krause, 2012); this decrease in gun homicides happened while the number of [estimated] guns in the US increased from 192,000,000 to 393,000,000 from 1996 to 2018 (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1996; Small Arms Survey, 2018).  Additionally, this includes the time when the Clinton Assault Weapons Ban expired in 2004 which made legal again 19 types of guns, as well as magazines capable of carrying more than 10 rounds (PBS, 2004).  An increase in guns does not correspond or correlate with more gun homicides. 

Returning to the numbers for the FBI homicide data of the 10,982 gun homicides (2018).  The breakdown of those total firearm deaths in 2017 are: 7,032 from handguns; 403 from rifles, 264 from shotguns; 187 from other guns; 3,096 from firearms not stated.  This is to say that all the gun homicides are committed by 0.01% of all gun owners; the number would actually be even smaller as it is not a 1-to-1 ratio of gun homicide victim to murderer, especially with the cases of a mass shooting.  Similarly, all the homicides committed by rifles – of which AR-15-style weapons would be one subset – is also around 0.002% of AR-15-style weapon owners; the number would be smaller as rifles as murder weapon includes more than just the AR-15-style which is the low end of the limited pool to be contrasted (403 out of 15,000,000).  Even with the Las Vegas music festival mass shooting doubling the mass shooting victim count for 2017, there were still 117 deaths because of mass shootings (Office for Victims of Crime, 2018).  That made it around 1% of all gun homicides for 2017 were part of mass shootings. 

Mass shootings are a small percentage of gun homicides, and gun homicides have decreased through the years.  Gun homicides are committed by a minute percentage of gun owners.  Having a lower gun homicide rate does not mean having a lower homicide rate, as we contrast with homicide rates across the world.  Yet, it is through those headline-grabbing events that politicians and news networks push an agenda of fear to get attention, for their vested interests.

Looking again at guns as tools, they can be used to murder, or they can be used to stop murders, to stop crimes, and to keep oneself, loved ones, and property safe.  One of the main reasons given by 67% of households who have a gun, was that it offered protection (Igielnik & Brown, 2017).  Defensive gun use with pistols included stopping one who killed one and paralyzed another in Rockledge, FL (Gallop, 2017), stopping one who killed another in Arlington, TX (McCausland, 2017), stopping one who shot at multiple, injuring one in Chicago, IL (Ziezulewicz, 2019), stopping one who murdered another in Portland, OR (Bernstein, 2014), among many other defensive use of pistols.  AR-15s can also be used defensively as when a home owner defended his property and himself against three home invaders, in Broken Arrow, OK (Associated Press, 2017), a teenage boy protecting himself, his younger sister, and the family home against home invaders, in TX (Hayward, 2013), Stephen Willeford used his AR-15 to stop the mass shooting in Sutherland Springs, TX (Brett, 2018).  These, among many others are examples of rifles – including AR-15s – being used defensively.  Again, even using the smallest estimate that Kleck (2018a) advised reflected a vast underrepresentation by the Violence Policy Center of defensive gun use, the defensive use is more than four times higher than the gun violence rate, and 13 times higher than the gun homicide rate: sixty times higher and more - up to 370 times - with other estimates of DGU against gun homicide.

DGU does not have to mean that the initiator of violence is killed by the one using a gun defensively.  Stephen Willeford engaged the shooter at the Baptist Church shooting; the shooter had already killed multiple people.  When Willeford shot back after getting his AR-15, he did not kill the shooter; however, the shooter stopped shooting at others when he was fired upon, and ran to his vehicle then left (Brett, 2018).  Nick Meli did not even shoot at the shooter at the Clackamas Mall shooting, but with his gun drawn and engaging the shooter, stopped him from firing upon others (Bella, 2013). 

Defensive use stops shooters.  DGU is the difference between a shooter acting as a fox in a chicken coop as an armed perpetrator with trapped victims who cannot fight back, as contrasted to a lion facing another lion.  In 1991, a man drove his truck through the front entrance of Luby’s Cafeteria, and armed with a couple of pistols began shooting the people inside the building before killing himself after police arrived and opened fire.  The police response was too late for many as 22 had been murdered and many more injured.  One unarmed man tried to stop the shooter during the shooting before the police arrived, but he was mortally wounded; that man’s wife chose to stay with her husband instead of fleeing, and she was killed as well (Kennedy & Harrison, 1991; UPI Archives, 1991).

Suzanna Gratia Hupp was a survivor at Luby’s Cafeteria, and testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about her experience (Hupp, 2013):

But as I began to stand up, we heard gunshots… I kept waiting for him to say something like, “Everyone put your wallets up on the tables!” But the gunshots continued. It took a good 45 seconds…which is an eternity, to realize that he was just there to execute people. As he made his way around the front of the truck, I watched as he leveled his gun on the head of a person crouched beneath him. He pulled the trigger. Then he calmly walked to the next person, pointed the gun and pulled the trigger. It was then that I thought, "I’ve got him!" I reached for my purse on the floor next to me. I had a perfect place to prop my shooting hand, and I have hit much smaller targets at much greater distances. Could I have missed? It’s possible. But it sure would have changed the odds. Then I realized that a few months earlier I had made the stupidest decision of my life. I had begun to leave my gun in my car because at that time, in the state of Texas, concealed carry laws did not exist. I was concerned about getting caught with it… I can't begin to get across to you how incredibly frustrating it is to sit there, like a fish in a barrel, and wait for it to be your turn, with no hope of defending yourself.
It was then that my father took my attention. He began to rise up and said, "I’ve got to do something! I’ve got to do something or he's going to kill everyone in here!" I turned to him and tried to hold him down by the shirt collar. But when he saw what he thought was a chance, he stood up and ran at the guy, who at that point was about a dozen feet from us. But the gunman had complete control of the room. He simply turned, and shot my father in the chest. My father fell in the aisle maybe 7 or 8 feet from me… it made the gunman change directions slightly, and he went off to my left…  I stood up, grabbed my mother by the shirt collar and said, “Come on, come on! Let's go! We’ve got to get out of here!”… and realized she had not followed me out… And I had no idea where my mother was.
… I will tell you that several of the first responders… told us that they had been in a conference at a hotel one building away when the shooting occurred. In an odd twist of gun control fate, the manager of the hotel asked them to leave their weapons in their vehicles so as not to make her customers uncomfortable. So precious minutes were lost as they retrieved their weapons from their locked trunks and made their way to the restaurant… They saw a lot of bodies, and a woman, on her knees in the aisle, cradling a mortally wounded man. They said that a man walked up to her, she looked up at him, he put a gun to her head, she looked down at her husband, and he pulled the trigger. That's how they knew who the gunman was. All they had to do was fire a shot into the ceiling, and this guy immediately rabbitted to a back bathroom alcove area. He exchanged some gun fire with them, and then put a bullet in his own head. 23 people were killed that day, including my parents.
I told the newspapers the next day that I was mad as hell at my legislators because they had legislated me out of the right to protect myself and my family. The only thing the gun laws did that day was prevent good people from protecting themselves.
Since that time, we have seen dozens of these mass shootings. Isn't it interesting that nearly all have occurred in places where guns were not allowed.
A lion without teeth or claws is no match for a lion that has both.  Being able to bite or shoot back, or at least be able to give the impression against a shooter than one can shoot back can help stop a shooter.  Willeford, Meli, the responders at Luby’s, each did not kill the shooter (the shooter ended up taking their own lives in each of those cases), but from their actions either in shooting back or letting it be known that they can shoot back, they helped stop a shooting and saved lives. 

Different guns fill different roles, such as a Derringer’s size makes it more easily concealable while the rack of a pump shotgun makes a sound that gets attention, and the look of an AR-15 (as well as its high functionality) each contribute to defensive usage.  Hupp could have shot back with the smaller weapon in her purse, if it was in her purse instead of her car, to follow ‘the law.’  While even the presence of an AR-15 or AR-15-style weapon helps discourage attacks, even during riots (Dunn, 1992; Flitter, 2014).

An old adage goes as “God created men equal.  Colonel Colt made them equal” (Eschner, 2017).  The point was about those who could exert less force being able to match those who could exert more force, along with some marketing.  Being able to match force with a gun if not wholly stopping a shooter, can redirect them.  If one possesses superior firepower, they may be able to stop by force or scare a shooter by that superior status. If it becomes necessary to fight or shoot back, you want an advantage.  More powerful, higher capacity, and other features increase functionality and improve one’s ability to shoot back.

Fairness is for games.  If you’re looking for a fair fight, you’re doing it wrong. 

What the data and the logic shows us, is that regardless of politicians and news groups trying to sell fear to get people to give them money or power, there is not an ‘epidemic of gun violence.’  Bad as it may be for those affected by gun violence, as a society it is not an epidemic, or ‘pandemic.’  Being for people being able to own and purchase guns is not to be for ‘kids getting killed’ as that is a gross non sequitur and straw man argument, as no one is advancing a ‘kill children’ platform.  Gun violence itself is a relativistic term.  If the goal was about saving lives, then it would be better for laws to be passed mandating what people can eat and drink, as diet-related diseases are the leading cause of death, accounting for one in five deaths globally (Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, 2018; Science Daily, 2019).  If the type of death is irrelevant (murder, suicide, and accident all treated the same), then diet is by far a greater killer than guns.

The numbers do not add up that gun control saves lives as when the number of guns had increased and bans on ‘assault weapons’ lapsed, the gun homicide rate decreased.  Guns are tools, and are used maliciously by an infinitesimal small percentage of gun owners, and are used defensively far more often than maliciously.  This is in addition to the non-malicious or defensive uses that guns have, such as collection, recreation, hunting, target shooting and the like.  As tools, when someone (generally a politician) is calling for regulating guns and making you have to get approval of what they left as allowable, it is a restriction on individual liberty in action and toward property.  Free people do not need permission to engage in non-coercive behaviors.  Politicians using the coercion of the State to restrict liberty of the people is another reason why the people should have guns: to defend themselves from internal threats to their individual rights, whether from other individuals or the government.

When it comes to calls for gun control, it is based upon the goal of solving crimes that have decreased without expanded gun control – included a decrease in gun control – as well as an increase in the gun supply, with the gun control laws to affect the entire population while most of the gun homicides are committed in 5% of the of street addresses, committed by 0.01% of a gun-owning population.  That is impractical to address the issue that it is supposed to address.  Restricting free people, holding them as guilty needing to prove innocence to get approval to have access of what has been left as allowable – restricting the property rights of those who have harmed none, is immoral.  Even if the best case scenario of politicians believing what they say that getting rid of guns, or controlling access of who can have access to guns, it is still the imposition of pulling the teeth and declawing the individuals in the populace.  Though the politician who advances the control may not want to further control people, that the people have been weakened leaves them more susceptible to the imposition of force from other individuals or an abusive State.

Penn Jillette summed up the second part of the threats when he spoke of the 2nd Amendment (2005):

    “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,” sure we need an organized military force to defend your country BUT “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
    This is the people in contrast with the militia. It doesn’t say ‘the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed’ it says “the right of the people.”
    Now why the word ‘people?’ Because the people who wrote this just fought a war for two years against a tyrannical state militia. They knew the time might come when they would have to do that again so they made the possession of weapons a right that the militia could never take away.
*numbers are based upon retrieved data, which though may or may not be the same available year, are close in dates.

References

Associated Press. (2017). Man who killed would-be burglars with AR-15 won't be charged. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2017/04/04/man-who-killed-would-be-burglars-with-ar-15-wont-be-charged/
Associated Press. (2019). Kamala Harris will call for a ban on importing AR-15-style assault weapons. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-kamala-harris-ar-15-assault-weapon-2020-story.html
Begley, P. (2015). Hunt family murders: Witness describes tense final night at farm. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/hunt-family-murders-witness-describes-final-night-at-family-home-20151007-gk2vo5.html
Bella, R. (2013). Clackamas Town Center shooting: Story of armed shopper fuels national debate. Retrieved from https://www.oregonlive.com/clackamascounty/2013/05/clackamas_town_center_shooting_84.html
Bernstein, M. (2014). Mystic club shooting: Bouncer wondered 'Is this real?' when bullets started flying. Retrieved from https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2014/01/post_414.html
Bowman, M. (2019). US Democrats Hail New Zealand's Move on Banning Assault Weapons  . Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/usa/us-politics/us-democrats-hail-new-zealands-move-banning-assault-weapons
Brett, J. (2018). "He had an AR-15, but so did I." Sutherland Springs hero hailed by NRA. Retrieved from https://www.ajc.com/blog/buzz/had-but-did-sutherland-springs-hero-hailed-nra/QAO2FwB8GcBBNdrax24lGO/
Chalabi, M. (2012). Gun homicides and gun ownership listed by country. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jul/22/gun-homicides-ownership-world-list
Crime Prevention Research Center. (2014). Comparing murder rates and gun owCrimnership across countries. Retrieved from https://crimeresearch.org/2014/03/comparing-murder-rates-across-countries/
Crime Prevention Research Center. (2017). Murders in US very concentrated: 54% of US counties in 2014 had zero murders, 2% of counties have 51% of the murders. Retrieved from https://crimeresearch.org/2017/04/number-murders-county-54-us-counties-2014-zero-murders-69-1-murder/
Daniels, J. (2018). Definition of what's actually an 'assault weapon' is a highly contentious issue. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/21/definition-of-whats-an-assault-weapon-is-a-very-contentious-issue.html
Dobuzinskis, A. (2019). Judge gives green light to Trump ban on gun 'bump stocks'. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-bumpstocks/judge-gives-green-light-to-trump-ban-on-gun-bump-stocks-idUSKCN1QF10L
Dunn, A. (1992). KING CASE AFTERMATH: A CITY IN CRISIS : Looters, Merchants Put Koreatown Under the Gun : Violence: Lacking confidence in the police, employees and others armed themselves to protect mini-mall. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-05-02-mn-1281-story.html
Evershed, N. (2019). Strict firearm laws reduce gun deaths: Here's the evidence. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2019/mar/20/strict-firearm-laws-reduce-gun-deaths-heres-the-evidence
Everytown. (2019). Gun Violence in America. Retrieved from https://everytownresearch.org/gun-violence-america/
Epstein, R. (2019). Passionate About Common-Sense Gun Reform? These Are the Politicians to Support. Retrieved from https://www.marieclaire.com/politics/g25005113/gun-control-lawmakers-2019/?slide=1
Eschner, K. (2017). On This Day in 1847, a Texas Ranger Walked Into Samuel Colt's Shop and Said, Make Me a Six-Shooter. Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/day-1847-texas-ranger-walked-samuel-colts-shop-and-said-make-me-six-shooter-180961621/
Gallop, J. (2017). Schlenker shooting: Rockledge gunman recovering, worked at Brevard elementary school. Retrieved from https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/2017/11/27/rockledge-gunman-recovering-worked-brevard-elementary-school/898582001/
Gillin, J. (2016). Updated - The Obameter: Work to renew the assault weapons ban. Retrieved from https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/1118/work-renew-assault-weapons-ban/
Greenwood, M. (2018). GOP lawmaker calls for assault rifle ban. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/375312-gop-rep-the-2nd-amendment-does-not-guarantee-that-every-civilian-can-bear-any
Hayward, J. (2013). "Assault rifle" saves teenagers from home invasion burglars. Retrieved from https://humanevents.com/2013/01/10/assault-rifle-saves-teenagers-from-home-invasion-burglars/?utm_referrer=https://www.heritage.org/
Hupp, S.  (2013). Written Testimony of Suzanna Gratia Hupp, D. C., Senate Judiciary Committee - Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights "Proposals to Reduce Gun Violence: Protecting Our Communities While Respecting the Second Amendment" Cong. (testimony of Suzanna Hupp).
Igielnik, R., & Brown, A. (2017). Americans' views on guns and gun ownership: 8 key findings. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/06/22/key-takeaways-on-americans-views-of-guns-and-gun-ownership/
Jillette, P. (2005). Gun Control [Television series season 3; episode 9]. In Penn & Teller: Bullshit! DVD/Blu-Ray
Kennedy, J., & Harrison, E. (1991). Killeen, a Town Deep in Mourning, Holds Prayer Services and Vigils for Its Victims : Massacre: The Texas community ponders that ordinary day and the ordinary people who were gunned down in the shooting rampage. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-10-19-mn-536-story.html
Kleck, G. (2018a). How the Hemenway surveys distorted estimates of defensive gun use frequency. Available at SSRN 3134859.
Kleck, G. (2018b). Response Errors in Surveys of Defensive Gun Use: A National Internet Survey Experiment. Crime & Delinquency, 64(9), 1119-1142.
Krouse, W. (2012). Gun Control Legislation (Rep.). Congressional Research Service.
Larsen, E. (2019). Gillibrand calls for assault weapon and large magazine bans to combat gun violence. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/gillibrand-calls-for-assault-weapon-and-large-magazine-bans-to-combat-gun-violence
Leaf, C. (2018). How Australia All But Ended Gun Violence. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2018/02/20/australia-gun-control-success/
Marshall, K. (2015). The Monash University shooting, Huan Yun Xiang, and what came after. Retrieved from https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/the-monash-university-shooting-huan-yun-xiang-and-what-came-after-20151021-gken8g.html
McCausland, P. (2017). Gun-toting "good Samaritan" kills active shooter in Texas sports bar, police say. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/good-samaritan-kills-active-shooter-texas-sports-bar-police-n755136
McEvoy, C., & Hideg, G. (2018). Global Violent Deaths 2017: Time to Decide (Rep.). Small Arms Survey.
McGowan, M. (2018). Margaret River mass shooting: Three guns at scene belonged to children's grandfather. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/may/12/margaret-river-deaths-three-guns-at-scene-belonged-to-childrens-grandfather
McGuirk, R. (2019). Gunman out on parole kills 4 in Australian city of Darwin. Retrieved from https://www.apnews.com/0ecb31747942447885623983f8608160
Mitchell, T. (2018). The demographics of gun ownership in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/06/22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/
Office for Victims of Crime. (2018). Mass Casualty Shootings (2018 National Crime Victims' Rights Week Resource Guide: Crime and Victimization Fact Sheets, Rep.).
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1996). Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention - The Nature of the Problem and Current Trends. Retrieved from https://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/gun_violence/sect01.html
PBS. (2004). Federal Assault Weapons Ban Expires. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/federal-assault-weapons-ban-expires
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. (2018). Diet-Related Diseases Are Leading Cause of Death in U.S. Retrieved from https://www.pcrm.org/news/health-nutrition/diet-related-diseases-are-leading-cause-death-us
Prevention Institute. (2019). Gun violence must stop. Here's what we can do to prevent more deaths. Retrieved from https://www.preventioninstitute.org/focus-areas/preventing-violence-and-reducing-injury/preventing-violence-advocacy
Radzievich, N., & Ford Turner. (2019). The AR-15: America's rifle or weapon of choice for mass shooters? Retrieved from https://www.mcall.com/news/local/allentown/mc-nws-allentown-mass-shooting-ar-15-20190621-qocicardovghdc6h3ajlo2kvye-story.html
Samuels, B. (2019). Sanders: 'We must follow New Zealand's lead' and ban assault weapons. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/435093-sanders-we-must-follow-new-zealand-and-ban-assault-weapons
Santhanam, L. (2018). There's a new global ranking of gun deaths. Here's where the U.S. stands. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/theres-a-new-global-ranking-of-gun-deaths-heres-where-the-u-s-stands
Science Daily. (2019). Globally, one in five deaths are associated with poor diet. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/04/190403193702.htm
Siegel, M. (2018). Implications of the Australian Experience With Firearm Regulation for US Gun Policy. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6187769/
Small Arms Survey. (2018). Global Firearms Holdings. Retrieved from http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/de/weapons-and-markets/tools/global-firearms-holdings.html
Stevens, M. (2019). Eric Swalwell on Gun Control. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/us/politics/eric-swalwell-gun-control.html
Tikkanen, A. (2016). Port Arthur Massacre. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/Port-Arthur-Massacre
UPI Archives. (1991). Luby's Cafeteria, scene of massacre, will reopen. Retrieved from https://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/12/03/Lubys-Cafeteria-scene-of-massacre-will-reopen/9450691736400/
U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/LFE046217
UNODC. (2013). Global Study on Homicide. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/gsh/
Violence Policy Center. (2015). Firearm Justifiable Homicides and Non-Fatal Self-Defense Gun Use: An Analysis of Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Crime Victimization Survey Data (Rep.).
Violence Policy Center. (2019). About the VPC. Retrieved from http://vpc.org/about-the-vpc/
Watkins, E. (2019). Swalwell on proposed assault weapons ban: 'Keep your pistols, keep your long rifles, keep your shotguns'. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/14/politics/eric-swalwell-gun-control-cnntv/index.html
World Health Organization. (2015). Global Strategies to Reduce Violence by 50% in 30 Years (Rep.). University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology Violence Research Centre.
Yablon, A. (2018). How Many Assault Weapons Do Americans Own? Retrieved from https://www.thetrace.org/2018/09/how-many-assault-weapons-in-the-us/
Ziezulewicz, G. (2019). Authorities: Military service member with concealed carry permit shoots attacker. Retrieved from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/chi-military-member-concealed-carry-shoots-attacker-20140706-story.html